|
|
|
@ -216,14 +216,33 @@ static void SetStencil(int x, int y, u8 value) {
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// TODO: Should the stencil mask be applied to the "dest" or "ref" operands? Most likely not!
|
|
|
|
|
static u8 PerformStencilAction(Regs::StencilAction action, u8 dest, u8 ref) {
|
|
|
|
|
static u8 PerformStencilAction(Regs::StencilAction action, u8 old_stencil, u8 ref) {
|
|
|
|
|
switch (action) {
|
|
|
|
|
case Regs::StencilAction::Keep:
|
|
|
|
|
return dest;
|
|
|
|
|
return old_stencil;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
case Regs::StencilAction::Xor:
|
|
|
|
|
return dest ^ ref;
|
|
|
|
|
case Regs::StencilAction::Zero:
|
|
|
|
|
return 0;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
case Regs::StencilAction::Replace:
|
|
|
|
|
return ref;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
case Regs::StencilAction::Increment:
|
|
|
|
|
// Saturated increment
|
|
|
|
|
return std::min<u8>(old_stencil, 254) + 1;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
case Regs::StencilAction::Decrement:
|
|
|
|
|
// Saturated decrement
|
|
|
|
|
return std::max<u8>(old_stencil, 1) - 1;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
case Regs::StencilAction::Invert:
|
|
|
|
|
return ~old_stencil;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
case Regs::StencilAction::IncrementWrap:
|
|
|
|
|
return old_stencil + 1;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
case Regs::StencilAction::DecrementWrap:
|
|
|
|
|
return old_stencil - 1;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
default:
|
|
|
|
|
LOG_CRITICAL(HW_GPU, "Unknown stencil action %x", (int)action);
|
|
|
|
@ -783,10 +802,16 @@ static void ProcessTriangleInternal(const Shader::OutputVertex& v0,
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
u8 old_stencil = 0;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
auto UpdateStencil = [stencil_test, x, y, &old_stencil](Pica::Regs::StencilAction action) {
|
|
|
|
|
u8 new_stencil = PerformStencilAction(action, old_stencil, stencil_test.reference_value);
|
|
|
|
|
SetStencil(x >> 4, y >> 4, (new_stencil & stencil_test.write_mask) | (old_stencil & ~stencil_test.write_mask));
|
|
|
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (stencil_action_enable) {
|
|
|
|
|
old_stencil = GetStencil(x >> 4, y >> 4);
|
|
|
|
|
u8 dest = old_stencil & stencil_test.mask;
|
|
|
|
|
u8 ref = stencil_test.reference_value & stencil_test.mask;
|
|
|
|
|
u8 dest = old_stencil & stencil_test.input_mask;
|
|
|
|
|
u8 ref = stencil_test.reference_value & stencil_test.input_mask;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
bool pass = false;
|
|
|
|
|
switch (stencil_test.func) {
|
|
|
|
@ -824,8 +849,7 @@ static void ProcessTriangleInternal(const Shader::OutputVertex& v0,
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (!pass) {
|
|
|
|
|
u8 new_stencil = PerformStencilAction(stencil_test.action_stencil_fail, old_stencil, stencil_test.replacement_value);
|
|
|
|
|
SetStencil(x >> 4, y >> 4, new_stencil);
|
|
|
|
|
UpdateStencil(stencil_test.action_stencil_fail);
|
|
|
|
|
continue;
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
@ -875,23 +899,19 @@ static void ProcessTriangleInternal(const Shader::OutputVertex& v0,
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (!pass) {
|
|
|
|
|
if (stencil_action_enable) {
|
|
|
|
|
u8 new_stencil = PerformStencilAction(stencil_test.action_depth_fail, old_stencil, stencil_test.replacement_value);
|
|
|
|
|
SetStencil(x >> 4, y >> 4, new_stencil);
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
if (stencil_action_enable)
|
|
|
|
|
UpdateStencil(stencil_test.action_depth_fail);
|
|
|
|
|
continue;
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (output_merger.depth_write_enable)
|
|
|
|
|
SetDepth(x >> 4, y >> 4, z);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (stencil_action_enable) {
|
|
|
|
|
// TODO: What happens if stencil testing is enabled, but depth testing is not? Will stencil get updated anyway?
|
|
|
|
|
u8 new_stencil = PerformStencilAction(stencil_test.action_depth_pass, old_stencil, stencil_test.replacement_value);
|
|
|
|
|
SetStencil(x >> 4, y >> 4, new_stencil);
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// The stencil depth_pass action is executed even if depth testing is disabled
|
|
|
|
|
if (stencil_action_enable)
|
|
|
|
|
UpdateStencil(stencil_test.action_depth_pass);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
auto dest = GetPixel(x >> 4, y >> 4);
|
|
|
|
|
Math::Vec4<u8> blend_output = combiner_output;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|