Merge pull request #661 from ogniK5377/assert-nit

No need to use ASSERT_MSG with an empty assert message
merge-requests/60/head
bunnei 2018-07-14 09:12:21 +07:00 committed by GitHub
commit ad0166a982
No known key found for this signature in database
GPG Key ID: 4AEE18F83AFDEB23
1 changed files with 2 additions and 2 deletions

@ -214,8 +214,8 @@ ResultCode HLERequestContext::WriteToOutgoingCommandBuffer(Thread& thread) {
(sizeof(IPC::CommandHeader) + sizeof(IPC::HandleDescriptorHeader)) / sizeof(u32); (sizeof(IPC::CommandHeader) + sizeof(IPC::HandleDescriptorHeader)) / sizeof(u32);
ASSERT_MSG(!handle_descriptor_header->send_current_pid, "Sending PID is not implemented"); ASSERT_MSG(!handle_descriptor_header->send_current_pid, "Sending PID is not implemented");
ASSERT_MSG(copy_objects.size() == handle_descriptor_header->num_handles_to_copy); ASSERT(copy_objects.size() == handle_descriptor_header->num_handles_to_copy);
ASSERT_MSG(move_objects.size() == handle_descriptor_header->num_handles_to_move); ASSERT(move_objects.size() == handle_descriptor_header->num_handles_to_move);
// We don't make a distinction between copy and move handles when translating since HLE // We don't make a distinction between copy and move handles when translating since HLE
// services don't deal with handles directly. However, the guest applications might check // services don't deal with handles directly. However, the guest applications might check